AI tested on people

[Gilman]

Not sure if my thread should be here in testing or it concerns philosophy... Actually, it is about both.
Some software devs were put under control of AI, it played a role of their project manager. AI fulfiled its obligations with flying colors but it was a complete fail for humans as a big part of a team was fired by a machine. How We Put Our Team Under Artificial Intelligence Control - Qubit Labs (https://qubit-labs.com/how-put-team-under-artificial-intelligence-control/) Can we call such testing successful?
IMHO, yes. People will have to suffer a bit to give AI a chance to study. In the nearest future developers will improve AI and it'd be more human-like in terms of emotions.

[Airicist]

There is a subforum about cobots (https://pr.ai/forumdisplay.php?2342), it seems that this thread should be moved there.
The truth is that in this subforum it is a question of robots, physical devices that are made in such a way as to do work with a person and not to cause people physical damage.
But non-material artificial intelligence must also have the ability to work with people and not impose moral damage on people.

[Airicist]

By analogy with cobots, we can suggest the term coAIs.

There can be AIs working in unmanned areas, and there can be AIs working with people - coAIs.